Library Catalogue
The use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges
Groppi Tania
The use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges - Oxford Hart Publishing 2013 - 431p xxxviii
Table of contents
Introduction. The Methodology of the Research: How to Assess the Reality of Transjudicial Communication?
Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau;
Part I;
1. Reference to Foreign Precedents by the Australian High Court: A Matter of Method Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone;
2. Canada: Protecting Rights in a 'Worldwide Rights Culture'. An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010) Gianluca Gentili;
3. India: A 'Critical' Use of Foreign Precedents in Constitutional Adjudication Valentina Rita Scotti;
4. The Supreme Court of Ireland and the Use of Foreign Precedents: The Value of Constitutional History
Cristina Fasone ;
5. Israel: Creating a Constitution-The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010) Suzie Navot;
6. Namibia: The Supreme Court as a Foreign Law Importer Irene Spigno;
7. South Africa: Teaching an 'Old Dog' New Tricks? An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010) Christa Rautenbach;
Part II;
8. Austria: Non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly-The Constitutional Court's Comparative Approach
Anna Gamper;
vi Contents;
9. Lifting the Constitutional Curtain? The Use of Foreign Precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court Stefan Martini;
10. Hungary: Unsystematic and Incoherent Borrowing of Law. The Use of Foreign Judicial Precedents in the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010 Zoltan Szente;
11. A Gap between the Apparent and Hidden Attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards Foreign Precedents Akiko Ejima;
12. Mexico: Struggling for an Open View In Constitutional Adjudication Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Ruben Sanchez Gil;
13. Romania: Analogical Reasoning as a Dialectical Instrument Elena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu;
14. Russia: Foreign Transplants in the Russian Constitution and Invisible Foreign Precedents in Decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court Sergey Belov;
15. Judges as Discursive Agent: The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan
Wen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh;
16. United States of America: First Cautious Attempts of Judicial Use of Foreign Precedents in the Supreme Court's Jurisprudence Angioletta Sperti;
Conclusion. The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges: A Limited Practice, An Uncertain Future Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau
9781849462716
1. Judgments - Foreign 2. Stare Decisisions 3. Constitutional Courts
342.030000 / GRO
The use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges - Oxford Hart Publishing 2013 - 431p xxxviii
Table of contents
Introduction. The Methodology of the Research: How to Assess the Reality of Transjudicial Communication?
Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau;
Part I;
1. Reference to Foreign Precedents by the Australian High Court: A Matter of Method Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone;
2. Canada: Protecting Rights in a 'Worldwide Rights Culture'. An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010) Gianluca Gentili;
3. India: A 'Critical' Use of Foreign Precedents in Constitutional Adjudication Valentina Rita Scotti;
4. The Supreme Court of Ireland and the Use of Foreign Precedents: The Value of Constitutional History
Cristina Fasone ;
5. Israel: Creating a Constitution-The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010) Suzie Navot;
6. Namibia: The Supreme Court as a Foreign Law Importer Irene Spigno;
7. South Africa: Teaching an 'Old Dog' New Tricks? An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010) Christa Rautenbach;
Part II;
8. Austria: Non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly-The Constitutional Court's Comparative Approach
Anna Gamper;
vi Contents;
9. Lifting the Constitutional Curtain? The Use of Foreign Precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court Stefan Martini;
10. Hungary: Unsystematic and Incoherent Borrowing of Law. The Use of Foreign Judicial Precedents in the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010 Zoltan Szente;
11. A Gap between the Apparent and Hidden Attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards Foreign Precedents Akiko Ejima;
12. Mexico: Struggling for an Open View In Constitutional Adjudication Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Ruben Sanchez Gil;
13. Romania: Analogical Reasoning as a Dialectical Instrument Elena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu;
14. Russia: Foreign Transplants in the Russian Constitution and Invisible Foreign Precedents in Decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court Sergey Belov;
15. Judges as Discursive Agent: The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan
Wen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh;
16. United States of America: First Cautious Attempts of Judicial Use of Foreign Precedents in the Supreme Court's Jurisprudence Angioletta Sperti;
Conclusion. The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges: A Limited Practice, An Uncertain Future Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau
9781849462716
1. Judgments - Foreign 2. Stare Decisisions 3. Constitutional Courts
342.030000 / GRO