NLSUI OPAC header image

The legal inclusion of extremist speech (Record no. 38099)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02537nam a2200217Ia 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20210302105549.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 160316s2005 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9789058501622
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency n
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 303.690000
Item number HON
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hong Quoc Loc
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The legal inclusion of extremist speech
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. The Netherlands
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Wolf Legal Publishers
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2005
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 232p
365 ## - TRADE PRICE
Price amount Gratis
505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note Description: <br/>The freedom of speech belongs to the classical human rights. However, are people who undermine human rights, and want to destroy democracy also entitled to the right of freedom of speech? This is the main question Q.L. Hong addresses in his PhD. thesis.At the end of July 2001, only six months before the attacks on the Twin Towers, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg reviewed the conflict between Turkey and the Refah Partisi. According to the Turkish government the goal of this political party is to destroy the Turkish democracy and to reinstate an Islamic theocracy instead. This being a reason for the Turkish government to disband the Refah Partisi. However is this not in violation with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which among others guarantees the freedom of speech and association? The judges of the European Court found that this was not the case: the ban on this party was just.The PhD. thesis of Quoc Loc Hong goes more deeply into the meaning of this case: can a democracy protect itself with repressive legislation against enemies , who use the freedom of speech to destroy this form of government, without violating the principle from which democracy itself derives her legitimacy? When this question is answered positively, another problem emerges. It must be prevented that the fight for democracy against the specific danger of anti-democratic expression will degenerate in a general restriction on the freedom of speech itself. The question is, if a democratic justification can be found for the strict control to which the judiciary subjects this legislation.The theme of Hong s thesis touches a highly current topic: the freedom of speech, which in the Netherlands too is currently at issue.Moreover this thesis discusses how democracy and the administration of justice should react, such as the sanctioning of the apologia, and the glorification of terrorist acts. lands too is currently at issue.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element 1. Radicalism - Extremist Speech2. Violence - Political Violence
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name
--
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type BOOKs
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        NLS NLS Library Compactors 30/05/2017   303.69 HON 32188 30/05/2017 30/05/2017 BOOKs