NLSUI OPAC header image

Prioritizing Agenda for Standard Essential Patents in India: An Economic Analysis

By: Contributor(s): Publication details: Bangalore NLSIU 2017Description: 82pSubject(s): Online resources:
Contents:
CONTENTS Preface; Abbreviations; List of Illustrations; List of Tables; 1 Introduction; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Background of the Study; 1.3 Agenda Setting by the Courts; 1.4 Focus of the Study; 1.5 Chapterisation Scheme; 2 Literature Review; 2.1 Standardisation and Innovation; 2.2 Standard Setting Organisations; 2.3 Cost of Switching and Market Risk; 2.4 Royalty Determination; 2.4.1 Zenith Conditioning Test; 2.4.2 25 per cent Rule; 2.5 International Jurisprudence on SEPs; 2.6 Economic Implications of Injunctions; 2.7 Reverse Hold-up; 2.8 Emerging Jurisprudence of SEPs in India; 3 Research Design; 3.1 Objectives of the Study; 3.2 Statement of the Research Problem; 3.3 Research Questions; 3.4 Analytical Framework; 3.5 Data and Methodology; 4 Agenda Setting for a Comprehensive Policy; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Reasons for Agenda Setting for SEPs; 4.3 Agenda Setting by the Courts: An International View; 4.4 Agenda Setting by the Courts in India; 4.5 Quantitative Linguistics; 4.6 Data and Methodology; 4.7 Results; 4.7.1 CCI Cases; 4.7.2 Delhi High Court Cases; 4.7.3 Cluster Analysis; 4.8 Conclusion; 5 Economic Analysis of Bargaining and Royalty Rates; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Hypothesis; 5.3 Bargaining; 5.3.1 Pre-Court Bargaining; 5.3.2 At the Court; 5.3.2.1 Case 1; 5.3.2.2 Case 2; 5.3.2.3 Case 3; 5.3.3 Bargaining Range; 5.4 Royalty Determination; 5.4.1 Hypothesis; 5.4.2 Zenith Conditioning Test; 5.4.3 25 per cent Rule; 5.4.4 FRAND Licensing Royalties; 5.4.4.1 Case 1; 5.4.4.2 Case 2; 5.4.5 Results; 6 Discussion; 6.1 Introduction; 6.2 Distinctiveness of SEPs; 6.3 FRAND Licensing; 6.4 Royalty Pricing; 6.5 Injunctions; 7 Public Interest and SEPs; 7.1 Introduction; 7.2 Data and Methodology; 8 Summary and Conclusion Way Forward; Appendix; Interview Questionnaire; MATLAB code for determining Royalty rates; Glossary; Wireless subscribers and Internet users in India; References.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Status Barcode
Dissertation NLS Not for loan MPP055

CONTENTS
Preface;
Abbreviations;
List of Illustrations;
List of Tables;
1 Introduction;
1.1 Introduction;
1.2 Background of the Study;
1.3 Agenda Setting by the Courts;
1.4 Focus of the Study;
1.5 Chapterisation Scheme;
2 Literature Review;
2.1 Standardisation and Innovation;
2.2 Standard Setting Organisations;
2.3 Cost of Switching and Market Risk;
2.4 Royalty Determination;
2.4.1 Zenith Conditioning Test;
2.4.2 25 per cent Rule;
2.5 International Jurisprudence on SEPs;
2.6 Economic Implications of Injunctions;
2.7 Reverse Hold-up;
2.8 Emerging Jurisprudence of SEPs in India;
3 Research Design;
3.1 Objectives of the Study;
3.2 Statement of the Research Problem;
3.3 Research Questions;
3.4 Analytical Framework;
3.5 Data and Methodology;
4 Agenda Setting for a Comprehensive Policy;
4.1 Introduction;
4.2 Reasons for Agenda Setting for SEPs;
4.3 Agenda Setting by the Courts: An International View;
4.4 Agenda Setting by the Courts in India;
4.5 Quantitative Linguistics;
4.6 Data and Methodology;
4.7 Results;
4.7.1 CCI Cases;
4.7.2 Delhi High Court Cases;
4.7.3 Cluster Analysis;
4.8 Conclusion;
5 Economic Analysis of Bargaining and Royalty Rates;
5.1 Introduction;
5.2 Hypothesis;
5.3 Bargaining;
5.3.1 Pre-Court Bargaining;
5.3.2 At the Court;
5.3.2.1 Case 1;
5.3.2.2 Case 2;
5.3.2.3 Case 3;
5.3.3 Bargaining Range;
5.4 Royalty Determination;
5.4.1 Hypothesis;
5.4.2 Zenith Conditioning Test;
5.4.3 25 per cent Rule;
5.4.4 FRAND Licensing Royalties;
5.4.4.1 Case 1;
5.4.4.2 Case 2;
5.4.5 Results;
6 Discussion;
6.1 Introduction;
6.2 Distinctiveness of SEPs;
6.3 FRAND Licensing;
6.4 Royalty Pricing;
6.5 Injunctions;
7 Public Interest and SEPs;
7.1 Introduction;
7.2 Data and Methodology;
8 Summary and Conclusion Way Forward;
Appendix;
Interview Questionnaire;
MATLAB code for determining Royalty rates;
Glossary;
Wireless subscribers and Internet users in India;
References.