

| Item type | Current library | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
NLS | Not for loan | MPP055 |
CONTENTS
Preface;
Abbreviations;
List of Illustrations;
List of Tables;
1 Introduction;
1.1 Introduction;
1.2 Background of the Study;
1.3 Agenda Setting by the Courts;
1.4 Focus of the Study;
1.5 Chapterisation Scheme;
2 Literature Review;
2.1 Standardisation and Innovation;
2.2 Standard Setting Organisations;
2.3 Cost of Switching and Market Risk;
2.4 Royalty Determination;
2.4.1 Zenith Conditioning Test;
2.4.2 25 per cent Rule;
2.5 International Jurisprudence on SEPs;
2.6 Economic Implications of Injunctions;
2.7 Reverse Hold-up;
2.8 Emerging Jurisprudence of SEPs in India;
3 Research Design;
3.1 Objectives of the Study;
3.2 Statement of the Research Problem;
3.3 Research Questions;
3.4 Analytical Framework;
3.5 Data and Methodology;
4 Agenda Setting for a Comprehensive Policy;
4.1 Introduction;
4.2 Reasons for Agenda Setting for SEPs;
4.3 Agenda Setting by the Courts: An International View;
4.4 Agenda Setting by the Courts in India;
4.5 Quantitative Linguistics;
4.6 Data and Methodology;
4.7 Results;
4.7.1 CCI Cases;
4.7.2 Delhi High Court Cases;
4.7.3 Cluster Analysis;
4.8 Conclusion;
5 Economic Analysis of Bargaining and Royalty Rates;
5.1 Introduction;
5.2 Hypothesis;
5.3 Bargaining;
5.3.1 Pre-Court Bargaining;
5.3.2 At the Court;
5.3.2.1 Case 1;
5.3.2.2 Case 2;
5.3.2.3 Case 3;
5.3.3 Bargaining Range;
5.4 Royalty Determination;
5.4.1 Hypothesis;
5.4.2 Zenith Conditioning Test;
5.4.3 25 per cent Rule;
5.4.4 FRAND Licensing Royalties;
5.4.4.1 Case 1;
5.4.4.2 Case 2;
5.4.5 Results;
6 Discussion;
6.1 Introduction;
6.2 Distinctiveness of SEPs;
6.3 FRAND Licensing;
6.4 Royalty Pricing;
6.5 Injunctions;
7 Public Interest and SEPs;
7.1 Introduction;
7.2 Data and Methodology;
8 Summary and Conclusion Way Forward;
Appendix;
Interview Questionnaire;
MATLAB code for determining Royalty rates;
Glossary;
Wireless subscribers and Internet users in India;
References.