Library Catalogue
Dam vs drinking water : exploring the Narmada judgement / L.C. Jain.
Publication details: Pune : Parisar, 2001.Description: 131 p. ; 23 cmSubject(s): DDC classification:- 333.91 JAI
Contents:
Note: II The Ideology of the Majority Judgement 12
The Presumptions of the Majority Judgement 19
III and its knowledge base
IV "Dam is the only solution": Majority Judgement 54
V How was the Availability of Narmada waters? Determined? 79
Legal and technical facts vis-Ã -vis the Majority Judgement
VI Holding the height of the dam – by 'inadvertence'? 88
VII Rehabilitation – a sensitive task 102
VIII The Petition and the Petitioner – how treated? 122.
| Item type | Current library | Shelving location | Call number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOKs
|
NLS | Library Compactors | 333.91 JAI-1 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 16541 | |
|
BOOKs
|
NLS | 333.91 JAI-2 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 16542 | ||
|
BOOKs
|
NLS | Library Compactors | 333.91 JAI-3 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 18085 |
Browsing NLS shelves,Shelving location: Library Compactors Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"An attempt to understand the ideology, presumtions, conclusions, and consequences of the judgement of the Supreme Court (18 October 2000) in the matter of Narmada Bachao Andolan versus Union of India and others. Petition (C) no. 319 of 1994."
Note: II The Ideology of the Majority Judgement 12
The Presumptions of the Majority Judgement 19
III and its knowledge base
IV "Dam is the only solution": Majority Judgement 54
V How was the Availability of Narmada waters? Determined? 79
Legal and technical facts vis-Ã -vis the Majority Judgement
VI Holding the height of the dam – by 'inadvertence'? 88
VII Rehabilitation – a sensitive task 102
VIII The Petition and the Petitioner – how treated? 122.