

| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Notes | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOKs
|
NLS | 342.5402 STU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | This book is accompanied by a CD | 30248 |
| No cover image available |
|
No cover image available |
|
|
|
|
||
| 342.5402 REV Review of the constitution : Real issues and hidden agendas | 342.5402 ROZ Unconstitutional constitutional amendments : | 342.5402 SIK-2 The constitution of India : | 342.5402 STU Constitutional conversations | 342.5406 CHA Presidential discretion / | 342.540858 NAR Right to privacy case : | 342.5409 KUL-2 Landmarks in Indian legal and constitutional history |
Table of Contents
Foreword;
Chief Justice Pius Langa;
Introduction: Law’s autonomy;
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop;
Chapters;
The South African Constitution as the last great modernist project;Stu Woolman;
Reply: A gentle provocation Justice Albie Sachs;
Constitutional supremacy and appellate jurisdiction in South Africa Frank Michelman;
Reply: On the reach of the Constitution and the nature of constitutional jurisdiction Justice Kate O’Regan;
The principle of democracy in South African constitutional law Theunis Roux;
Reply: Writing the law democratically Danie Brand;
True in theory, true in practice: Why direct application still matters Stu Woolman;
Reply: Summarising Proust Iain Currie;
Limitations: Shared constitutional interpretation, an appropriate normative framework and hard choices Stu Woolman & Henk Botha
Reply: Sharing interpretation Johan van der Walt ;
The widening gyre of dignity Stu Woolman;
Reply: The soul of dignity Justice Laurie Ackermann;
Towards a substantive right to equality Cathi Albertyn & Beth Goldblatt;
Reply: A cautionary note regarding substantive equality Karthy Govender;
The ‘arbitrary deprivation’ vortex: Constitutional property law after FNB Theunis Roux;
Reply: Against regulatory taking: In defence of the two-stage inquiry Frank Michelman;
Socio-economic rights: Revisiting the reasonableness review/minimum core debate Sandra Liebenberg;
Reply: On ‘dialogue’, ‘translation’ and ‘voice’ Marius Pieterse