000			13500nam a2200205Ia 4500
999			_c2101 _d2101
003			OSt
005			20210922113810.0
008			160316s2000 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_c.
082			_a340.028 CHA _bCHA
100			_aChari K Gururaja
245			_aAdvocacy and professional ethics ( In retrospect and prospect )
260			_aAllahabad _bWadhwa and Co. _c2000
300			_a1266p _cix
365			_bRs.825
505			_aCONTENTS: • PREFACE VII; • CONTENTS IX; PART-I PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT; CHAPTER: 1. Introduction 3; 2. Interaction with clients 9; 3. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 order III Rule 4 12; 4. Seven Lamps of Advocacy 20; 5. Arguments in Appeals and Revision 24; 6. Professional Conduct 30; 7. Professional Misconduct 41; B. Professional Advertising 49; 9. Toutism and Advocacy 59; 10. Conflict of Interest 74; 11. Champerty and Maintenance 93; 12. Fee structure 103; 13. Maintaining Accounts of Client's Fee 120; 14. Professional Rights and Privileges of Advocates 125; 15. Duties of an Advocate 152; 16. Contempt of Court and Lawyers 213; 17. Strike Protests-Demonstrations by Legal Professionals 277; lB . Information Technology and the Legal Professionals 281; 19. Advocates and Political Activities 290; PART-II PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, SKILLS AND RESPONSIBILITIES; CHAPTER: 1. Judge 297; 2. Ethics 301; 3. The professional responsibilities of Advocates 313; 4. Role of an Advocate and Rules of Practice 318; 5. Art of Advocacy 324; 6. Hints on Advocacy 327; 7. Conduct of an Advocate-In General 336; 8. Which relevant facts and Law to be placed before Court? 347; 9. Persuasion through Arguments 353; 10. Skill of attracting clients 364; 11. The future problems of Advocacy 375; 12. Success in the Profession 382; 13. The preparation of brief 388; 14. Legal Aid 409; 15. The Junior Bar 460; 16. 'Amicus curiae' 461; 17. Legal practitioner whether a Consumer?- Under Consumer Protection Act 466; PART-III LECTURES BY EMINENT JURISTS; • Professional Ethics-M.C. Setalvad 471; • Lecture on Professional Ethics-T.S. Krishnamurrhy lyer 476; • Profess ional Independence vis-a-vis Professional negligence/ Adventurism-P.P. Roo 481; • Senior-Junior Relationship-P.P. Rao 488; • Supreme Court on Professional Misconduct- Malik Aljan Das 492; • The state of the Legal Profession in India-Review of the Advocates Act, 1961-P.P. Rao 494; • Role of the Legal Profession in Administration of Justice 500; • Ethics and Discipline in the Legal Profession- P.P. Rao 502; • Professional Conduct-Taikad Subramonia Iyer 511; • The Legal Profession in the Lawasia region problems, pressures, expectations-F.S. Nariman 516; • Judicial accountability-P.P. Rao 524; • Judicial accountability-KK Venugopal 533; • The Legal Profession and Accountability-KK Venugopal 537; • The Lawyers' strike and the duty of the Supreme Court-H.M. Seervai 545; • Strikes by Professionals-P.P. Rao 549; • The law relating to strike, picketing etc. In India-P.C. Krishnan 557; • Role of the Bar- H.R. Khanna 572; • Access to justice and Role of the Bar Association-P.P. Rao 578; • Best Traditions of the Bar-Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.N. Venkatachalaiah 580; • The Indian Bar-P.P. Rao 587; • The Art of a Lawyer-Nageshwar Prasad 589; • Advocacy-B. Malik 599; • Advocacy-G.B. Pai 606; • The American Bar Association : Organisation & Activities 608; • Foreign Legal Consultants and the Emerging Economies of Asia-KK Venugopal 616; • Speech of K.K. Venugopal. President --Df the Union International des Advocats (UIA) at Philadelphia 621; • Bench-Bar. Relations: Crisis of credibility-P.P. Rao 624; • Temper on the Bench-C.P. Singh 627; • Allegations against a Judge-Role of the Bar-P.P. Roo 631; • Judicial Activism-Its positive and negative Aspects-p.P. Rao 634; • The Lawyer of today-Polishing the tarnished image-F.S. Nariman 641; • Poor litigants and costly counsel-P.P. Rao 645; • Statutory ceiling on Lawyers' Fees-P.P. Roo 648; • Is a change necessary in the lawyer's dress-BaLraj Trikha 651; • Re-organization of the legal system in order to ensure speedy justice 653; • Public confidence in the Judiciary-Some Comments -B.R. Sharma 661; • Law and Society-P.P. Rao 671; • Status of women in Law and Society-J. C. Khurana 676; • Consumer Protection Act and Professionals 684 • Legal Education needs immediate reform-P.P. Roo 692; • Boycott of Courts by Lawyers-P.P. Roo 699; • Press Media Utilization by Advocates[Doordarshan-AIR-NewspapersJ- Pt.Pmmanand Katara 703; PART-IV SUPREME COURT ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND ADVOCATES ACT; • Sardul Singh s . Pritam Singh & Ors. (Grave Mi.sconduct) 709; • V. Sudeer ~s. Bar Council of India & Anr. (Cancellation of pre-enrolment training) 712; • In Re Mr Nand Lal Balwani etc. (Contempt case) 722; • Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. India & Anr. {Conrempt power of supreme court for punishment) 724; • L.C. Goyal Vs. Nawal Kishore (ProJessional Misconduct) 737; • P.D. Gupta Vs. Ram Murti & Anr. (ProJessional Misconduct) 740; • Prahlad Saran Gupta Vs . Bar Council of India (Professional Misconduct) 746; • Hikmat Ali Khan Vs. Ishwar Prasad Arya & Ors. (Misconduct Adequacy Test) 753; • Dr. D .C. Saxena Vs. Hon'ble Chief Ju~tice of India (Criminal contempt-Scandalising the • Court) 758; • Dr. Haniraj L. Chulani Vs. Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa (Simultaneous Practice of • another proJession alongwith Practice of Law) 778; • C. Ravichandran Iyer Vs.Justice A.M. Bhattacharjee & Ors.(Disciplinary Power of Bar Council-Conduct oj a Judge) 786; • U.P. Sales Tax Service Association Vs. Taxation Bar Association (Strike. Criminal contempt- • Conduct oj Advocates) 794; • In Re Sanjiv Datta. Deputy Secretary. Ministry of Information & Broadcasting. New Delhi • (Criminal Contempt) 801; • In Re Vinay Chandra Mishra (Contempt case) (Suo moto Contempt) 807; • Indian Council of Legal Aid & Advice etc. Vs. Bar Council of India & Anr. (Age restriction Jor • enrolment) 827; • Common Cause, A Regd. Society Vs. Union of India & Drs. (Strike by Lawyers) 830; • Mangilal & Ors. Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh (Strike by Lawyers) 832; • State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Vs. U.P. State Law Officers' Association & Ors. (Arbitrariness-Engagement of Lawyers by Government or public bodies) 834; • J .S. Jadhav Vs. Mustafa Haji Mohamed Yusuf (Misconduct) 840; • D.S. Dalal Vs. State Bank of India & Ors. (Misconduct) 843; • Devendra Bhai Shankar Mehta Vs. Rameshchandra Vithaldas Sheth & Anr. (Misconduct-Defrauding & Cheating) 846; • Prttam Pal Vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh,Jabalpur : Thro' Registrar (Contempt case-Inherent-Power) 849; • M.B. Sanghi, Advocate Vs. High Court of Punjab & Haryana & Ors. (Contempt case-Disparaging and derogatory remarks against a Judge) 855; • An Advocate Vs. B.B. Haradara & Ors. (Doctrine of benefi t of doubt-Miscondu c t & Negligence-Tests laid d own by Supreme Court) 858; • Charanlal Sahu Vs. Union of India & Anr. (Contempt under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971) 861; • T.V. Chaudhary, In re--And-E.S. Reddi Vs. The Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. (Position and role of Senior Advocate of Supreme Court) 862; • Damodardass Agarwal and othe rs Vs. R. Badrilal and others (Privileges and rights of pleader) 865; • Varinderpal Singh Vs . Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R Sharma & Ors. (Frivolous Petitions) 877; • Satyendra Narain Singh and others Vs. Ram ath Singh and others (Propriety of appearing before his father) 878; • Sunil Kumar Pal Vs. Phota Sheikh and others profession-(Professional ethics) 879; • L.D. Jaikwal Vs. State of U.P. (Contempt case) Pandurang Dattatreya Khandekar Vs . The Bar Council of Maharashtra. Bombay and others (Misconduc[-Supreme Court's interference when called for] 884; • M. Veerabhadra Rao Vs . Tek Chand (Professional misconduc[-Standards of professional conduct and etiquette] 891; • K.V. Umre Vs. Smt. Venubai D. Garg and another (Misappropriation) 896; • Chandra Shekhar Soni Vs. Bar Council of Rajasthan and others Supreme Court's interference in findings of State Bar Council-(Professional Misconduct) 897; • Narendra Singh Vs. Chhotey Singh and another (Power of Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India) 900; • R.K. Garg. Advocate Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (Contempt case) 905 • V.C. Rangadurai Vs. D. Gopalan and others (Professional misconduct) 908 • Employers in relation to Manoharbahal Colliery. Calcutta Vs. K.N. Mishra and others (Compromise Decree) 911; • Bar Council of Maharashtra Vs. M.V. Dabholkar and others (Disciplinary Proceedings) 913; • Jamilabai Abdul Kadar Vs. Shankerlal Gulabchand and others (compromise) 915; • Gobind Ram Vs. State of Maharashtra Kaur Vs. P.C. Chaturvedi (Contempt case) Smt. Harbans(Contempt case) 918; • Perspective Publications (P) Ltd. and another Vs. State of Maharashtra (Contempt case-Difference between defamation of Judge and contempt of Court) 928; • Hari Narain Vs. Inaccurate petitions) and Badri Das (Misleading-untrue statements in petitions) 935; • In the Matter of 'p' An Advocate (Professional Misconduct) 937; • Lalit Mohan Das Vs. Advocate General, Orissa (Duty and conduct of Advocates) 942; • M.Y. Shareef and another Vs. The Hon'ble Judges of the High Court of Nagpur and others (Contempt case) 944; • In the Matter of Mr. 'G', A Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court (Maifttenance and champerty) 949; • Sukhdevraj Vs. Emperor (Contempt case under I .P.C.) 954; • PRIVY COUNCIL DECISIONS ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS: • Balogh Vs . St. Albans Crown Court (Contempt of Court) 955; • Debi Prasad Sharma & others Vs. Emperor (Contempt of Court-Scandalising Test-Proceedings) 963; • George Frier Grahame Vs . Attorney-General , Fiji (Professional Misconduct) 967; • Andre Paul Terence Ambard Vs. Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago (Contempt) 974; • Sheonandan Prasad Singh and others Vs. Hakim Abdul Fateh Mohammad Reza and another (Compromise) 978; • A, a pleader Vs. the Judges of the High Court of Madras (Charge of Professional Misconduct) 981; • Sourendra Nath Mitra and others Vs. Tambala Dasi (Authority to Compromise) 984; • In Re : a Solicitor Ex parte the Law Society (Champerty-Professional Misconduct) 989; • Allinson Vs . General Council of Medical --Education and Registration (Professional Misconduct) 993; • DECISIONS FROM ENGLAND LAW REPORTS : • Re. Freston (Contempt of Court) 997; • R Vs. Gray (Contempt of Court) 1000; • Haseldine Vs. Hosken (Cha mperty) 1003; • Myers Vs. Elman (Professional Misconduct) 1008; • Re : A Solicitor (Conduct un befitting a Solicitor) 1016; • Abraham Vs. Jutsun (Payment by Solicitor personally) 1019; • R. Vs. Yule (D is hones ty) 1022; • Rondel Vs. Worsley ( egligence-Immunity) 1026; • Weston Vs. Courts Administrator of the Central Criminal Court (Contempt of Court) 1056; • Hilborne Vs. Law Society of Singapore (Professional Misconduct) 1063; • Bell Vs. Peter Browne & Co. (A Firm) (Negligence) 1066; • Finers (A Firm) & others Vs. Miro (Duty of confidentiality to client) 1079; • Bevan Ashford (A Firm) Vs. Geoff Yeandle (Contractors) Ltd. (in Liquidation) (Solicitor-Conditional Fee Agreement-Whether Agreement Champertous) 1088; • R. Vs. Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary ex-parte Begley 1098; • R. Vs. McWilliams (Right of person in custody-Access to) 1098; • DECISIONS FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT REPORTS: • Stephen S. Chandler Vs. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit of the United States (Independence of Judges) 1103; • Willie Jasper Darden Vs. Louie L. Wainwright (Argument of Counsel) 1110; • Federal Trade Commission Vs. Superior Court Trial Lawyers' Association (Attorneys' Fees-Boycott of Court) 1116; • DECISIONS FROM AUSTRALIAN LAW REPORTS: • Blackwell Vs. Barroile Pty Ltd. & Ors. (Professional Negligence-Duty of care) 1123; • Chamberlain Vs. Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory (Discipline-Professional Misconduct) 1137; • Trade Practices Commission Vs. CC (New South Wales) Pty. Ltd. & others (Conflict of Interest) 1148; • Carindale Country Club Estate Pty. Ltd. Vs. Astill & others (Confidential Information to Solicitors) 1155; • Putti Vs. Simpson (Duty to present proper evidence and submissions) 1162; • Drummond & Co. and Lamb and others (Legal Aid-Advice and Assistance-Payment of Fees- • Prescribed Limit) ... 1165 • DECISIONS FROM COMMONWEALTH LAW REPORTS : Rooks Rider (A Firm) Vs. Steel and others (Solicitor-Officer of Court) 1169; Evan Rees & others Vs. Richard Alfred Crane (Judge's Removal from Office) 1177; Hemmens Vs. Wilson Browne (A Firm) (Solicitor-Negligence-Duty of care) 1191; Lawrence Pat Sankar & The State of Trinidad & Tobago (Barrister-Conduct of Case-Duties to Client) 1201; Invercargill City Council Vs. Hamlin (Negligence-Duty of care to whom?) 1206; PART-V APPENDICES: I. EXTRACT FROM THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961 1215; II . EXTRACT FROM THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA RULES 1238; III. EXTRACT FROM THE SUPREME COURT RULES, 1966 (As amended up-to date) 1265;
650			_a1. Advocacy Skills - Professional Responsibility2. Professional Ethics - Advocates 3. Professional Conduct - Advocates
700			_a _a
942			_2ddc _cBK