000			03318cam a2200349 i 4500
001			22933882
005			20260702164638.0
008			230119s2023 njua b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2022056651
020			_a9780691250489 _q(paperback)
035			_a22933882
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dDLC
042			_apcc
082	0	0	_a323 TER _223/eng/20230123
100	1		_aTerman, Rochelle, _d1986- _eauthor.
245	1	4	_aThe geopolitics of shaming : _bwhen human rights pressure works--and when it backfires / _cRochelle Terman.
264		1	_aPrinceton : _bPrinceton University Press, _c[2023]
300			_axiii, 199 pages : _billustrations ; _c24 cm.
365			_bRs. 2855.00
490	0		_aPrinceton studies in international history and politics
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction -- A relational theory of international shaming : the shamer -- A relational theory of international shaming : the target -- Interstate shaming in the universal periodic review -- International shaming and domestic politics -- Applications -- Conclusion.
520			_a"A bold new perspective on the strategic logic of international human rights enforcementWhen a government violates the rights of its citizens, the international community can respond by exerting moral pressure and urging reform. Yet many of the most egregious violations appear to go unpunished. In many cases, shaming not only fails to induce compliance but also incites a backlash, provoking resistance and worsening human rights practices. The Geopolitics of Shaming presents a new theory on the strategic logic of international human rights enforcement, revealing why and how states punish violations in other countries, when shaming leads to an improvement in human rights conditions, and when it backfires.Drawing on a wide range of evidence-from large-scale cross-national data to original survey experiments and detailed case studies-Rochelle Layla Terman shows how human rights shaming is a deeply political process, one that operates in and through strategic relationships. Arguing that preexisting geopolitical relationships condition both the causes and consequences of shaming in world politics, she shows how adversaries are quick to condemn human rights abuses but often provoke a counterproductive response while friends and allies are the most effective shamers but can be reluctant to impose meaningful sanctions.Upending conventional wisdom on the role of norms in world affairs, The Geopolitics of Shaming demonstrates that politicization is integral to-not a corruption of-the success of the global human rights project"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aHuman rights _xInternational cooperation.
650		0	_aHuman rights advocacy _xPolitical aspects.
650		0	_aInternational relations _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Human Rights _2bisacsh
650		7	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / Political Advocacy _2bisacsh
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c218015 _d218015