000			01308nam a2200217Ia 4500
999			_c22100 _d22100
003			OSt
005			20200815231919.0
008			160316s2004 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9780199274123
040			_cNLS
082			_a347.050400 _bDES
100			_aDe S Mitchel
245			_aJudicial Deliberations : A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy
260			_aOxford _bOxford University Press _c2004
300			_a382p
365			_bRs.4,475
505			_aTable of Contents 1:Introduction PART I: The Three Courts - Raw Analysis 2:The French Bifurcation 3:The American Unification 4:The European Union: Discursive Bifurcation Revisited PART II: Bifurcation 5:Similarity and Difference 6:France: How is the discursive bifurcation maintained? 7:The ECJ: The French bifurcation reworked PART III: Comparison 8:The Sliding Scales 9:Apples and Oranges 10:On Judicial Transparency, Control, and Accountability 11:On Judicial Debate, Deliberation, and Legitimacy 12:Concluding Postscript Bibliography
650			_a1. Judicial Transparency - Comparative Analysis 2. Judicial Deliberation 3. Judicial Control - Accountability4. Judicial Decissions - Comparative Analysis 5. Judicial Legitimacy6. Judicial Operation
700			_aLasser L E _a
942			_2ddc _cBK