000			03048nam a2200217Ia 4500
999			_c35087 _d35087
003			OSt
005			20210628164549.0
008			160316s2013 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9781849462716
040			_cn
082			_a342.030000 _bGRO
100			_aGroppi Tania
245			_aThe use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges
260			_aOxford _bHart Publishing _c2013
300			_a431p _cxxxviii
365			_b Rs. 6,420
505			_aTable of contents Introduction. The Methodology of the Research: How to Assess the Reality of Transjudicial Communication? Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau; Part I; 1. Reference to Foreign Precedents by the Australian High Court: A Matter of Method Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone; 2. Canada: Protecting Rights in a 'Worldwide Rights Culture'. An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010) Gianluca Gentili; 3. India: A 'Critical' Use of Foreign Precedents in Constitutional Adjudication Valentina Rita Scotti; 4. The Supreme Court of Ireland and the Use of Foreign Precedents: The Value of Constitutional History Cristina Fasone ; 5. Israel: Creating a Constitution-The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010) Suzie Navot; 6. Namibia: The Supreme Court as a Foreign Law Importer Irene Spigno; 7. South Africa: Teaching an 'Old Dog' New Tricks? An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010) Christa Rautenbach; Part II; 8. Austria: Non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly-The Constitutional Court's Comparative Approach Anna Gamper; vi Contents; 9. Lifting the Constitutional Curtain? The Use of Foreign Precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court Stefan Martini; 10. Hungary: Unsystematic and Incoherent Borrowing of Law. The Use of Foreign Judicial Precedents in the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010 Zoltan Szente; 11. A Gap between the Apparent and Hidden Attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards Foreign Precedents Akiko Ejima; 12. Mexico: Struggling for an Open View In Constitutional Adjudication Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Ruben Sanchez Gil; 13. Romania: Analogical Reasoning as a Dialectical Instrument Elena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu; 14. Russia: Foreign Transplants in the Russian Constitution and Invisible Foreign Precedents in Decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court Sergey Belov; 15. Judges as Discursive Agent: The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan Wen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh; 16. United States of America: First Cautious Attempts of Judicial Use of Foreign Precedents in the Supreme Court's Jurisprudence Angioletta Sperti; Conclusion. The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges: A Limited Practice, An Uncertain Future Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau
650			_a1. Judgments - Foreign 2. Stare Decisisions 3. Constitutional Courts
700			_aPonthoreau Marie-Claire _a
942			_2ddc _cBK